Wednesday, October 29, 2008

THE POINT IS, TIP.


Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point is an excellent tool for those interested in the theory of, what I consider, Possibility. He clearly identifies types of movements throughout our population that shape and profile aspects of life from fashion to human nature. Gladwell labels people as well, classifying them by their actions and attributes. As a whole, the book is an excellent foundation for those not only starting a journey in the PR world, but also for those already immersed within it.

I consider Possibility to be the over arching theme of this book. Everything Gladwell discusses is dependent. Everything is a variable, whether it be a type of person or a type of movement. Once a variable acts upon a situation, everything changes. The Possibility changes.

Gladwell points to three types of movements that can tip a product, disease, ect. over its balance point. When a product tips it manifests itself within a part of society. Suddenly it experiences exponential growth and if were to put the data of that growth on a graph, the point where the graph shot up or down would be considered the tipping point.

The Law of the Few, the Stickiness Factor and the Power of Context are the three points Gladwell discusses when talking about how a product might sweep through society. He claims that when all three of these ideas are in place, that a product will tip.

The Law of the Few deals with exceptional people who may find about a trend, and through their social connections, they spread the trendy epidemic. Think about it as seeing someone wearing an 80’s style jacket and you think to yourself, “That’s a cool jacket, and not many people have anything like it.” So you decide to buy one. You wear the jacket and someone else sees you and thinks to themselves the same thought you did. Then they buy one like it and so on and so forth.

The Stickiness Factor is very well defined in The Tipping Point and I will use a direct quote from the book here.

"The stickiness factor says that there are specific ways of making
a contagious message memorable; there are relatively simple changes
in the presentation and structuring of information that can make a
big difference in how much of an impact it makes."

Gladwell has a simple and clear definition for the Power of Context. He states “that human beings are a lot more sensitive to their environment than they may seem.” Generally, we can assume that everyone is a product of his or her environment. Actions and reactions, thoughts, the way someone dresses, beliefs and mannerisms are all shaped by our environment. We are results of our surroundings.

In further attempt to provide direction in understanding Possibility and epidemics, Gladwell breaks down people into three groups: Mavens, Connectors and Salesmen. Mavens are the type of people who particularly enjoy finding great deals on products. They will be glad to let you know when and where you can find the best prices or experiences when you are looking to purchase. Connectors are people that know a lot of people. They introduce and are introduced. In short, they get around. Salesmen can make us want to buy. Many times, we don’t even know why, but they have the art of the sell.

When I consider myself, I’m not quite sure where I fit. With some aspects of life I’m a Maven. I thoroughly enjoy finding the best deals on products such as cell phones and other electronic equipment. I’ll spend long hours on the computer meticulously researching what people think about a product, their likes and dislikes. I’ll find every spec and feature. And of course I always shop around for the best prices. Sometimes I’ll delay a purchase just to wait for ebay deals. I don’t particularly see myself as a Connector. I don’t feel the need to know a great deal of people and for what it’s worth, I’m not entirely positive what a “great deal of people” entails. I suppose I’m a tiny bit of a Salesman, but that’s only for products and ideas that I’m profoundly interested in.

Our current project in PR Admin has been going well. I’ve been exceedingly pleased with the effort everyone has put into everything. And when I think about which if these concepts would be most beneficial to our progress, only ones comes to the forefront of my mind: the Power of Context. I believe that creating an environment around campus of enjoyment and anticipation of school athletic events is crucial to our progression throughout or project. When a basketball game is coming up, people should feel it in the air. They should plan their day around it. I want to hear students asking each other if they are going to the game that night. I would like to spend some time focusing on the little things that shape people’s campus environment. What are we over looking? Where can we carve out a niche that no one else has found? There is simply something and somewhere we haven’t gone and I would like find out what it is and explore it.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Too much PR?



I decided to Google the words "public relations strategy." I thought for sure I would come up with some thought provoking and new way to think about PR and possibly stumble upon some innovative ways to practice PR that I hadn't thought of before.

I came across a site discussing public relations on a tight budget. It outlined 5 key steps in practicing PR while trying to squeeze value into every dollar spent.

After reading step 5, I found myself wondering about something in particular. The very first sentence says that once you start promoting your business, you should never stop.

What I began wondering is if this is actually the case. Is there ever a point when media outlets become tired of a constant stream of information about a business? But at the same time, does someone starting a new business have the responsibility to do everything in his or her power to promote his or her business?

At first glance, I would say anyone starting a business should do everything possible to promote and further the business and increase profits. This seems like the most sensible answer. However, I've been taught by some of my esteemed teachers here at GCSU (that's not sarcastic, I really do think most of them have a lot to offer) that sometimes people from newspapers can get tired of constantly receiving news releases and other information of the like.

So does this same theory apply to PR when promoting a business? Is there ever such a thing as too much PR?

Monday, October 6, 2008

Someone help me out


I was looking at the Facebook profile of one of GCSU's esteemed teachers and my wonderful advisor, Macon Mcginley. She has a post there of a new voting PSA. I encourage everyone who reads this blog to view the video here.

My question is this. Is a PSA closer to marketing or public relations? I contend that it has elements of both. This voting PSA is attempting to get people to vote. This seems to be an element of marketing. At the same time, the PSA is trying to relate to me an idea. In a way it is trying to instill a thought process in me, much the same way I see many companies using PR. So, someone help me out. Where do i place the PSA?

As a side note, I was a little offended by the video. Yes, I did think part of it was funny. But think about this. I feel like the video is aimed at our generation. And the way it was decided to reach out generation is to tell us not to vote and to make some crude jokes. This is what someone thought I needed to hear in order to make me vote. Pathetic.